Originally posted by <guest>:
Rockne/Tim -
You seem to be an original founder of this forum and or site? If so, and knowing what you seem to know about the history of the Coyle brothers - how could an article be allowed to be posted on this site that seems to "recommend" Scrip Advantage and/or National Scrip Center. Even if it was just a columnists opinion - could you guys have executed editorialship and warned people reading the article about the possibility of instability with any of these companies? Seems you know enough to ask this: is Great Lakes legit? New England scrip legit(the article is even referred to at their site)? I understand your response would just be your opinion...
www.ptotoday.com/0301scrip.html
Yup -- Rockne = Tim Sullivan, and I am the founder of PTO Today. In a former life I also worked for a company that offered scrip for sale, so I've followed this particular type of fundraising even more closely than others.
You ask a very good question. That article was written 4 and a half years ago, and is dated. I wouldn't say that it recommends NSC or SA, but the article (from 4.5 years ago) is generally positive about scrip.
It's tough/impossible for us to continually update all old articles as news/details change. What we've done to date is just date the articles, so folks know they're old/archives. There's another article from that same general time that lists Troll as a bookfair option. Troll was purchased by Scholastic several years ago.
We're discussing internally if/how we should update old articles. Or if we can make the fact that they're old more clear.
In the meantime, we've been well in front of this issue, in my opinion. We actually reported on Schoolpop's financial troubles before anyone else. Because schoolpop was a public company, their financials were accessible. First I heard about Scrip Advantage's issues were right here on these message boards. Since then we've been actively investigating (and linked to it from our home page), in an effort to keep groups informed.
As far as Great Lakes or New England or others -- I'm not privy to their financials, and I don't know the principals of those firms well. I do know that scrip is a tough business. To succeed in it on the business side you have to be disciplined and conservative. Several of the folks who've struggled/failed were the opposite of that. Do check references. Do check credit references. Great Lakes has been in the business a long time; they're quite large and I've never heard a complaint. Seems to me like they're fairly conservative.
If you're sticking with scrip and want to see scrip succeed, know that things like realistic turnaround times (as opposed to one or two days) and realistic percentages (the broker needs to keep some) are part of the deal, if you want to work with a stable company. If a broker offers you the moon, expect trouble down the road.
Tim