AT my child's Elementary School the Principal eliminated the prize program from the fall fundraiser. Sales of $45,000 with profits of about $21,000 decreased by half. It seems a few parents complained "It wasn't fair to everyone," so she just nixed it. It seems like throwing out the baby with the bath water.
At our new school, we only use one fund raiser with prize incentives based on amount of sales. In order to spread these around, we also asked the Rep to include prizes for groups (highest selling classrooms) and one for the whole school that didn't cost anything ( Principal dyes her hair purple if we get over 50% participation). This is great for morale and all the kids can enjoy it. Also, instead of giving a big prize to the top two sellers, we spent the money on the discounted cost of a limo, and any kid that sells over 36 items gets a limo ride for free pizza. The limo will make as many trips as is necessary. This spreads the prize around to more kids. You can also have drawings for big prizes in which every child is given a ticket.
On our Entertainment book sales, we got rid of the prizes offered by the company rep based on number of books sold, and instead bought a prize for every student in the school, regardless of participation. So, no one was left out. We also distributed the books at Registration with the parents signing for them so that the kids weren't handling it, and parents had the opportunity to decline to participate.
Finally, we had several parents interested in placing orders with kids who couldn't. The parents simply gave the teacher $5 for each child (the teacher told them how much she needed) and the teacher made a donation for the children without any orders on their forms. Donations count for prizes (we negotiated that from our REp). So these kids are included in the prize program, too.
There are always kinks, but I believe if you address the problems, you can find solutions. Don't nix the whole program. It always upsets me when reasonable rationale people who support something are ignored because they choose not to be the squeaky wheel. So, the decision is based on the few irrational people who probably are going to complain no matter what. I have found that many people who want to eliminate a program altogether because of the "injustice" to another group, won't actually step forward to do something to help alleviate the injustice of that group they are concerned about. Just use it as an excuse to pooh pooh's others ideas.
My suggestion is to approach your Superintendent with the strength of the large number of parents who are in favor of prizes. The Superintendent will NEVER make Every parent happy, so he should care about the majority. Offer alternatives to make the programs more fair and accessible to a greater number of students. Perhaps form a committee to develop District-wide guidelines.
WE once had a Superintendint who seemed to introduce policies or make decisions that were extreme in one way. Then parents would step forward to voice their views and a "compromise" ie: reasonable position was adopted. I think he did this to get parents involved. Annoying, but smart.
[ 09-20-2002: Message edited by: kwtorres ]</p>