I'm very thankful my VP (and close friend) isn't like yours!!
CHECK YOUR BYLAWS!!! I'd have a real problem with a VP being given unreined ability to approve expenditures. It sounds petty, but you know what--you ARE president, and with all that "glory"
also comes RESPONSIBLITY. In the end, "the powers that be" don't care who the VP, committee chair or treasurer is--because you know what? In the end when something goes amiss YOU will be the one called on the carpet and held responsible for the actions of others. Right or wrong-that's the way it is. When one of our committee chairs got a little crazy with HER "power" and OKed certain aspects and EXPENSIVE expenditures for an un-named fundraiser (that the executive board
had OKed) WITHOUT my OR the VPs or the FUNDRAISING CHAIR'S or the TREASURER's OK and presented us with a fundraiser we felt was run half-assed and the bill, I admittedly got a little crazy that my position had been circumvented. But the damage was done, the fundraiser was already in motion and it would have become VERY ugly had we just refused payment of the bill. What made me the craziest was actually not that she had gone ahead and spent the money AND made certain decisions about the fundraiser without my official OK (
) but rather that SHE went off the
deep-end for ME being angry! I'm now "power hungry" and "controlling." BTW the same person also is angry that I wasn't "more involved" in the directing of the committee or taking care of certain aspects of the fundraiser. Never mind when I saw things starting to go amiss and I DID ask if they needed help, or had suggestions for certain aspects of this fundraiser I was told at that time that I was "controlling" and a "power freak!" And before anyone reminds me there are polite and diplomatic ways to do these things--BELIEVE ME--this I know and was careful about.
Needless to say, this person and I aren't exactly friends now, which is too bad, because I had been fond of this person up to this point.
I'm
totally with Metzy about the introduction and authority thing. A lot of this I'm finding out through a rather painful learning process! I too am in a quandry about how to gently remind people that we have a elected governing body of the group for a reason. I've come to the conclusion there isn't any way to do that. Tactful and polite ways, perhaps, but in then end those who resent or just don't understand your authority are always going to see it their way, and see the gentlest of reminders as a foot-stomping, bitch-slapping attack. The people who DO get it never need the reminder and generally don't have issues with you.
BTW, I TOTALLY admit I have control issues [img]tongue.gif[/img] . BUT it doesn't mean I always ACT on them.