I think you need to focus on the positives and aspects of stability in this situation. Yes, the building changes every two years, but the kids are moving as a group each year. Their friends are still there with them. They get new teachers every year anyway so that doesn't matter. I don't see why it has to be a negative thing. Plus everyone, regardless of their socio-economic background gets the same chance at a good education.
When we were evacuated last Dec (due to civil unrest) my husband, the School Board president), struggled with what to do with our children. The options were to put them into a public or private school in OK (our point of origin) or to somehow find a way to have our school relocated to a central point (Houston). My choice was a central school for all of our students within the US which is what we did. They would have the stability of the same teachers, same curriculum, same friends (and even new ones as other students joined us from Caracas.) etc...and that's what we ended up doing. Some parents chose to enroll their children in public schools and they now say what a mistake it was. They didn't know anyone, the classes were different, the discipline was different, it was just hard all around. Our kids didn't seem to blink an eye that their building was different. It was just a building!
As for the comment of "good kids and bad kids"...I'm sure that wasn't meant as written!
Neighborhoods don't determine if a child is bad or good and all children deserve the opportunity for an education! :cool: