Originally posted by AngiY:
So if I ran for office, does that mean officers can implement ideas regardless if the members vote them down?
No, not in a correctly-functioning group. Just as your feeling put-upon now, imagine how other new members might feel/react, if you go into office and just do whatever you like. It's a quick recipe for the "clique" accusation and even lower involvement.
Originally posted by AngiY:
Perhaps it's in the presentation ....
-- we can't be the only ones doing it all....
....It almost seems dysfunctional looking at it like that!
It definitely *could* be in the presentation; that certainly can play a big role in how things are perceived and received.
But it seems to me like you're putting the cart before the horse. You've got ideas for a $10k fundraiser that are getting shot down; there are only 5 active people (and maybe 2 who are real active); there is little in the way of systems or rules -- you've got to start with the most basic problem first: involvement.
You and your "ally" need to focus on gettiung more people involved who share a vision for what your PTO can be or wants to be? If you have 2 now, can you get to 6 or 8? Even those 3 who aren't supportive currently -- are you guys on the same page as to what you want the PTO to be/do? Gotta get there. First.
And if you get a team all agreeing on direction, then start some planning together. Pick one or two involvement activities (a
School Family Night
maybe?) and work on connecting with and engaging more school parents. Then your 6 or 8 can hopefully become 10 or 12 (volunteers/workers) and dozens and dozens more parents who participate.
Starting with involvement is key because: 1) research proves just how essential increased involvement is to school performance; and 2) even your fundraising efforts will struggle, unless you raise involvement first.
Love to continue the discussion and here from others.
Tim
[ 03-10-2006, 08:07 PM: Message edited by: Rockne ]