Sick'n'Tired I feel your pain. Our teachers have allowed tenure to get the better of them, and while you'll see the occasional effort made, it's more than likely to be half-assed. The times a teacher DOES offer something, the turnout is so overwhelming that it turns them off from wanting to do more. :confused: You know--doing that token gesture to
look like they care, but not wanting to really make a go at it. This is a big issue I've been talking to our superintendent about, as well as writing to our BOE about; complete with articles and studies about how involvement on all levels and is crucial to a district's success. I figure if I can't make them see the logic, at least I can be a splinter under their fingernails and get out some frustration that way!
I don't buy into the union aspect of not allowing them contractually to spend extra time at the school. They can stay as long as they'd like--they just can't be REQUIRED to stay. The same goes for extra curricular activities.
Not for nothing, if they became teachers wanting to be clock watchers they should be ashamed of themselves. If they don't want to make others "look bad," then I'd say there's a SERIOUS problem with the administration. Peer pressure may be a b!tch, but I expect more out of someone whose salary I'm paying with my tax dollars.
Forcing or requiring them to be there defeats the purpose, however shaming them into it might not be a bad idea! [img]tongue.gif[/img] Perhaps calling a meeting asking why there's zero participation might be enlightening. You never know, they MIGHT actually have an understandable reason why they're behavior is beyond reason.
Has anyone brought this up to the superintendent and BOE?