Notice that voting will take to vote her out has to be given. I would follow the procedure to cover yourself, but be prepared she might round up a possie to out vote to keep her on. So I would have specific reasons on hand as to why you want her to be removed.
Good Luck
BTDT
Cindy<br />
<br><br />
<br>____________________________________________<br />
<br>"People have the right to be stupid, but some abuse the privelege."
MrPresident;137467 wrote: ... at a regular meeting where previous notice has been given ...
I would interpret this to mean that previous notice of the impending vote has been given.
If this officer is as bad as you say, you're going to get trouble anyway. But if you give proper notice, at least you'll know you did everything you could to manage the process as fairly as possible.
Good luck to you. This is going to be difficult no matter how you work it.
Some people come into our lives and quickly go. Some stay for awhile and leave footprints on our hearts. And we are never, ever the same."
"The ultimate aim of karate lies not in victory or defeat but in the true perfection of one's character."
Got a quick question or interpretation. Our bylaws state that for removal :
Officers can be removed from office with or without cause by a 2/3 vote of those present at a regular meeting where previous notice has been given, assuming a quorum.
The question I have is this, we have our monthly meeting coming up in a few weeks, do I need to serve notice that we will be voting for removal of an officer or does the monthly meeting cover me in this instance.
We have an officer who has done nothing but try to wreck our group from the get go. We finally have had enough and will be voting her out, but I need to know if the above works because she will come at us with "That meeting was not legal as notice was not given" etc.
