Message Boards

×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.
×
Looking for advice? Join us on Facebook

Get advice, ideas, and support from other parent group leaders just like you—join our closed Facebook group for PTO and PTA Leaders & Volunteers .

One Woman rules! (Principal)

20 years 10 months ago #64628 by jonwilson
Replied by jonwilson on topic RE: One Woman rules! (Principal)
I get it JHB.
Thanks.
20 years 10 months ago #64627 by JHB
jonwilson:
In Texas "GT" used to be the "Gifted and Talented" designation for kids identified as accelerated learners. Now I believe they call it "Advanced Academics". But most of us with kids in the program try to avoid saying our children are in AA! [img]tongue.gif[/img]
20 years 10 months ago #64626 by jonwilson
Replied by jonwilson on topic RE: One Woman rules! (Principal)
IMove,
What a terrific post! I don't know what GT means, but the rest was great.
20 years 10 months ago #64625 by IMovePeople
Replied by IMovePeople on topic RE: One Woman rules! (Principal)
Sandy - having gone to our elementary principal last year with a concern over (ARGH!!!!!) standardized testing and his adamance to hold my GT child back because she didn't attend school one day that test were being given (Oh yeah, the picnic we attended instead was infectious strep!) - anyway - after going to the district level and being told that it was a decision of TEA, I found my way around the Texas Education Agency website ( www.tea.state.tx.us ), made countless phone calls, wrote letters and faxed them one after the other until the principal called me and asked why I was going over his head. OOPS! I made the mistake of thinking that I had the right to participate in my own child's education - WHAT WAS I THINKING?

Anyway - your question got me thinking so back I went to the site - seems we, in the great state of Texas - have Senate Bill 19 - which addresses the improvement of children’s health through daily physical activity in public schools and a coordinated approach by public schools to prevent obesity and certain diseases.

I cannot tell you where it has gotten - but you could start with your local rep to Austin - call and ask for the status. I think that the bill gave TEA the responsibility of setting guidelines, but from what I've read it calls for "daily" physical activity at the elementary level. P.E. 3 days a week would only be daily if the kids are only in school 3 days a week. And if they are calling computers physical activity - your PTO better start raising serious money for new computers every year. O.K. - off my sarcastic soapbox I climb . . . good luck!
20 years 10 months ago #64624 by jonwilson
Replied by jonwilson on topic RE: One Woman rules! (Principal)
I still think the necessity of recess dictates a louder, broader attention getting movement.
20 years 10 months ago #64623 by sherwoodpkmom
Replied by sherwoodpkmom on topic RE: One Woman rules! (Principal)
OH Sandy you do seem to be between a rock & a hard(head) place. Particularly with Federal mandates in place regarding obesity in children and the need for MORE physical activities, I just don't understand your principal!
In our school, PE is only once a week--it's a resource along with computer, art and music--BUT every day the kids get a recess of sorts after their class lunch period. The actual eating time is only about 15-20 minutes, then the teachers take the classes onto the playground for the rest of the period. Most teachers live for this time for the kids to run off some of their energy. Have you spoken to any of the teachers?? We also have a site based advisory committee, but it includes teachers AND parents. The ultimate decision IS the principal's, but ours realizes that the more people you make happy with your decision, the more cooperation you'll get as far as compliance.
Good luck in your situation [img]smile.gif[/img]
Time to create page: 0.057 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
^ Top