We have a President and a co-president (who will lead the group next year) and for each VP (fundraising and enrichment) we also have co-VPs. This certainly spreads out the responsibility.
- kelly.behrendt@yahoo.com
Links in this post:
I like the structure Kelly suggests below -- a president who runs the group and a co-president who is essentially an assistant to the president and training to run the group the following year. The problem with having two co-presidents of equal authority is that someone needs to be responsible for making a final decision. Otherwise you end up with a deadlock when they disagree. Co-presidents sharing the office works when the co-presidents have a strong rapport, but it doesn't work as a continuing structure. The article Cochair Survival Skills offers tips on making a situation like that work. Whatever you decide, it's great that you have enough people willing to take a leadership role that you can consider expanding your board.
- Craig
Links in this post:
Cochair Survival Skills: https:/classic.ptotoday.com//pto-today-articles/article/355-cochair-survival-skills
I just reread your question and realized I didn't really read it all the way through the first time. Most PTAs and PTOs have a president, vp, treasurer, and secretary. Some split the secretary job into two parts: recording secretary (takes the minutes and is responsible for maintaining group records) and corresponding secretary (responsible for communications such as the newsletter). Some groups have a volunteer coordinator (a good idea, in my opinion) who recruits volunteers and keeps a database of volunteer information. You might also add to the board the chair of one or two key committees. For example, if you have a fundraising chair, that person might be on the board. If you're having trouble attracting officers, you might be better off expanding the board than adding officer positions. Sometimes it's the title that scares people off rather than the actual work. Good luck!
- Craig
Links in this post: